Hitler’s Alliance With The Soviet Union :: European History Essays

Hitler’s Alliance With The Soviet Union When the world awoke August 24, 1939 it appeared that the absolute impossible had just occurred in Europe, National Socialist Germany and Soviet Russia had just agreed on a Non Aggression pact. By that morning the entire political world had changed, it had been thrown roughly on its head and people quickly asked how it could have happened? Over a period of three years the German chancellor, Adolph Hitler had repeatedly pushed the major powers to the limit with his territorial demands in the Rhineland, Austria, Czechoslovakia, and now in the Polish corridor. Hitler had succeeded in each gamble and grown bolder each time as he noticed the vacillating nature of the supposed major powers that stood in the way of his completing his long held foreign policy program. This program, first coherently laid down in his 1924 book Mein Kampf, called for the re-armament of Germany and the acquisition of allies like Italy and Britain, the neutralization or destruction of his hated enemy France, and finally with Germany’s rear protected the way would be clear for the great fight against Judeo-Bolshevism in the Soviet Union, and the gaining of Lebensraum for the superior Aryan German race. Since coming to power in 1933, Hitler had completed the first phase of his program save for the making of a British alliance or at least their promise of neutrality in any upcoming European war of revision. Realizing that the British would need some coercing to accept his program, and that if war was to come with the west his eastern border must be secured, Hitler relied on his great ability to play the game of power politics and shocked the world by allying with his sworn enemy. Hitler sought the Non-Aggression pact and covert military alliance with the Soviet Union because it was a temporary means to an all encompassing end. Hitler would use the hated Soviets to secure his eastern flank while he destroyed France with or without the help of Britain, only to return the favor by attacking them when Germany was ready. It was a move consistent with the power politics and foreign policy program he had been pursuing since 1933, his attempts to force Britain into a military alliance or at least a proclamation of neutrality in any continental war, and the subjugation of France as a prerequisite to obtaining Lebensraum in the East. The Non-Aggression pact of August 1939, was the pre war culmination of policies designed by Hitler to further his foreign policy program of making

Ida’s Impairment

1) (1) The U. S. GAAP section 360-10-35-21 states â€Å"A long-lived asset (asset group) shall be tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable†. An example of an event like this is a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset. As stated in the case, one of Ida’s competitors sold its extremely comparable commercial building for an amount significantly less than its asking price.Since these assets are very similar in comparison, this significantly less price for the competitor’s building is an example of a decrease in the market price of Ida’s commercial building. Therefore under the U. S. GAAP, Ida needs to test the U. S. commercial building for recoverability. (2) Under IAS 36. 12, there are certain external factors that lead you to want to test for recovery such as a decline in market value. The sale of the building across the street is an example of one of those external factors.IAS 36. 6 explains impairment and how to record impairment. Under IFRSs IAS 36. 66, the recoverable amount of cash-generating units (CGUs) should be determined for the individual asset. Therefore, a recoverability test must be done. 2) As of U. S. GAAP 360-10-35-17, when reporting to its U. S. based lender as of December 31, 2010, Ida should record $600 for impairment on the U. S. commercial building. Under GAAP, one must compare the fair value to the carrying amount.Since the fair market value is $3,900 and the carrying amount is $4,500, impairment is calculated as the difference $600. *All dollars in thousands (U. S. GAAP 360-10-35-17) 3) Under IAS 36. 6, when reporting to its parent as of December 31, 2010, Ida should record $500 for impairment on the U. S. commercial building. The recoverable amount for the commercial building is $4,000. The carrying amount is $4,500. Since the carrying amount is greater than the recoverable, the impairment is the diffe rence. *All dollars in thousands (IAS 36. 6)

Independent Behaviour

iINDEPENDENT BEHAVIOUR (12 MARK ESSAY) Some reasons people show signs of independent behaviour (i. e. do not conform or obey) is influence by many factors, Gender being one of them. Neto carried out the same study as Asch, but this time all the participants were female (as in Asch’s study they were all male). In Asch’s study he found that 37% of the participants conformed, whereas Neto found that 59% conformed. However Asch’s study was criticized for lacking ecological validity and Neto’s study is a replication of Asch.As the participants were not in a natural situation Linz and Semykina took data from a survey of over 2,600 Russian employees between 2000 and 2003. They found that men are more likely to have internal Locus of Control and a need for challenge and women more likely to exhibit external locus of control and need for affiliation (belonging to a group). High Internal females earned more than external women. The fact there is a large sample size of 2600 means the findings are reliable, good sample size.However it can be argued that there is a potential cultural bias as the data was only taken from Russian employees. When Asch debriefed his participants, he found a common factor of confidence in the people who hadn’t conformed if someone felt confident in their judgments; they were more able to resist group pressure. This idea is supported by Perin and Spencer’s study. They replicated Asch’s study with engineering students. Conformity levels were much lower. Perin and Spencer attributed this to the fact that engineers had confidence in their skills in making accurate observations.

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy

Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) is a multimodal treatment model developed by Marsha Linehan, an American clinical psychologist, in the early 1980s (Palmer, 2002; Neacsiu, Ward-Ciesielski, Linehan, 2012; Linehan, 1993a).Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More DBT is based on the principles and strategies of an early treatment known as cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) and was originally intended for individuals presenting with suicidal symptoms (Linehan, 1993b). DBT replaced CBT in the treatment of suicidal individuals because the latter’s strategies had failed since most clients responded to treatment by withdrawing or attacking the therapist. Moreover, counselor experienced a variety of difficulties with the use of CBT in treating suicidal clients, especially, the competing priorities concerning the need to decrease suicidality, teaching the clients new behavioral skills, and managing distress among the clients (Neacsiu et al., 2012; Linehan, 1993b). DBT is designed to provide a comprehensive approach to treating suicidal clients, such as people who are suffering from borderline personality disorder (BPD). The treatment is based on theoretical premises and the principles of validation, acceptance, and mindfulness (Feigenbaum, 2007; Swales, 2009; Wix, 2003). Apart from borderline personality disorder (BPD), DBT has also been used in the treatment of anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), self-destructive behaviors, impulsive behaviors, and alcohol/drug problems (Feigenbaum, 2007). This paper summarizes different aspects of DBT the major concepts and premises, means of assessment, goal setting, processes, and applicability. The Philosophical Elements of DBT There are three major philosophical elements that underlie DBT including dialectics, Zen Buddhism, and behavioural science (Palmer, 2002; Neacsiu et al., 2012). The basic element of DBT in relation to behavioural science is cognitive-behavioural therapy. DBT is based on the therapeutic techniques of CBT, which emphasize on self-monitoring and collaborative efforts from both the client and the therapist (Palmer, 2002). However, it is important to note that some aspects of CBT are not effective in addressing the problems present among suicidal clients. In order to address the challenges associated with behavioural science approaches such as CBT in the treatment of individuals with BPD, the DBT approach incorporates the principles of Zen.Advertising Looking for research paper on psychology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Here, the Zen philosophy encourages people to forego their ideas regarding their view of reality, and focus on the current moment through acceptance, self-validation, and tolerance. From the Zen perspective, the world is perfect as it is and each moment of reality should be accepted without judgment (Robins et al., 2004). This principle is incorporated into the mindfulness component of DBT, which emphasizes on the need for patients to intentionally live in the present moment without judging, rejecting, or getting attached to the moment (Linehan, 1993b). On the other hand, counselors and their BPD clients will recognize that putting acceptance and change together in any treatment session is very difficult. Therefore, DBT incorporates the dialectical element, which emphasizes on the importance of synthesizing opposites. Here, dialectics is a very important component of DBT, especially in dealing with multi-problem clients, because it allows them to initiate behavioural change by means of acceptance and self-validation (Neacsiu et al., 2002). The dialectical philosophy encourages clients to take a holistic look at different perspectives, encapsulate opposites, and move on continuously. Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Assumptions Alongs ide the philosophical elements of DBT identified in the foregoing discussions, the treatment involves a number of assumptions about the client and the counselor. On the part of the client, DBT assumes that the clients are capable of doing their best to solve their problems. Furthermore, the therapist assumes that the clients cannot fail in the DBT treatment. Additionally, there is the assumption that the clients may not be the source of all the problems they are facing, but they must be willing to solve them either way. Most importantly, the therapy assumes that the lives of people suffering from BPD are unbearable, and therefore, the clients must be motivated to change their lives for the better (Neacsiu et al., 2012; Kliem, Kroger, Kosfelder, 2010). About the therapist and the therapy itself, it is presumed that the counselor has a responsibility in caring and helping the clients to change their ways and achieve their goals in life. Moreover, the therapist must conduct DBT with u tmost clarity, precision, and compassion while ensuring that the therapeutic relationship with the clients exemplifies a real interaction between equals.Advertising We will write a custom research paper sample on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Further, it is presumed that the principles of behaviour apply to the therapist in the same way they apply to clients. On the other hand, the therapist needs support in caring and helping the clients suffering from BPD. Other overarching assumptions imply that the therapist can fail in delivering DBT and the treatment can fail even without the therapists fault (Linehan, 1993a; Miller, Rathus, Linehan, 2007). Theoretical Foundations of DBT The biosocial theory of borderline personality disorder informs the dialectical behaviour therapy. The theory hypothesizes that BPD arises when an emotionally-vulnerable person interacts with an invalidating environment (Lineha n, 1993a; Swales, 2009; Palmer, 2002). Emotional vulnerability refers to instances where an individual reacts excessively to less harmful stressors and takes long time to regain baseline emotions after the stressor is removed (Swales, 2009). When a growing child is exposed to an invalidating environment, it is probable that s/he will not have the opportunity to understand his/her personal feelings and experiences. Besides, this child may not be able to relate his/her responses to particular events in the real world as he/she lacks the support of the others in solving or coping with difficult/stressful situations, most especially when none acknowledges the problems associated with such situations (Huss Baer, 2007). Consequently, the child turns to the immediate environment for answers regarding his/her problems, but the environment may limit the demands that she makes on the significant others. In the long run, the child may begin hoping to gain acceptance from others as well as dev elop extreme emotions to make others to acknowledge her experiences. An obvious consequence of this erratic emotional response is that it prevents the child from understanding and controlling specific emotions. Furthermore, the child may not achieve emotion modulation because the situation does not allow her to acquire the necessary skills (Crowell et al., 2009). Overall, the child slips into a state of emotional dysregulation, which upon interacting with the invalidating environment, leads to Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Therefore, based on this theory, DBT is designed to help borderline patients to recover emotional control under validating environments.Advertising Looking for research paper on psychology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Means of Assessment/BPD Diagnosis Emotional dysregulation in a growing child can interact with the invalidating environment to cause BPD. As a result, emotional dysregulation is a central feature in the development of BPD (Neacsiu et al., 2012; Linehan, 1993a; Linehan, Bohus, Lynch, 2007). From a DBT perspective, emotions are considered as complex involuntary responses to both the internal and external environments. In DBT, such emotional responses are categorized into various subsystems, important to treatment because they are the main targets of different emotion regulation processes of DBT. These subsystems include emotional vulnerability to cues, triggers, response tendencies, nonverbal and verbal expressive actions/responses, and secondary emotions, which interact in different ways to produce a particular pattern of emotions. Therefore, one can assess emotion dysregulation by examining the way an individual alters or controls various subsystems of responses under average or no rmal conditions. Emotion dysregulation is characterized by excessive negative affect, irrational thoughts, impulsive emotional behaviours, dissociation under stress, and difficulties in controlling physiological arousal and in undertaking non-mood-dependent activities (Linehan et al., 2007). Various self-destructive behaviours, dysfunctional behaviours, and maladaptive responses are important indicators of emotion dysregulation. Goal Setting in DBT In DBT, goals for treatment are set through collaborative efforts involving both the therapist and the client. However, the therapist plays a major role in modifying the clients’ goals to fit into the treatment model. Here, a treatment target hierarchy is used in determining the problem focus in each treatment session. In most cases, the therapist gives the highest priority to addressing suicidal and self-injurious behaviours among the clients. These behaviours are commonly referred to as out-of-control and usually categorized into life-interfering, life-threatening, and severe quality-of-life-interfering behaviours. Once a client has achieved stability and control over these dysfunctional behaviours, then the therapy focuses on activities aimed stabilizing the clients’ emotions and alleviating trauma. Further, the therapy moves to activities that increase the clients’ self-respect and decreasing problems that cab interfere with the clients’ ability to achieve personal goals. Finally, the therapy proceeds to resolving the clients’ experiences and feelings of incompleteness (Koerner Linehan, 1992; Kliem et al., 2010). Moreover, it is imperative for the therapy to address various secondary targets, such as inhibited behavioural patterns, which may interfere with the progress made in treatment. Processes and Specific Techniques in DBT The main objectives of DBT are to enhance the clients’ capabilities and motivate them accordingly achieved by increasing the clients’ set of skilled behaviors, generalizing the learned behaviours to the natural environment, improving the clients’ motivation, reducing dysfunctional behaviours and eliminating their reinforcements, reinforcing effective behaviors and increasing the therapists’ motivation and capabilities. These functions of DBT are further supported by four major modes of treatment, which include individual psychotherapy, skills training group therapy, consultation teams, and phone coaching. On the other hand, DBT focuses on problem-solving by means of validation and dialectical strategies. Therefore, the treatment involves specific techniques such as change strategies, validation strategies, dialectical strategies, communication strategies, and case management strategies (Neacsiu et al., 2012). Moreover, these broad categories involve more specific processes and techniques of handling borderline clients. There are many treatment techniques borrowed from CBT, such as targeting, attention t o in-session behaviours, chain analysis, opposite action, and observing limits (Linehan, 1993a; Dimeff Linehan, 2001). Applicability DBT is the most widely investigated psychosocial model of treatment for BPD. A myriad of studies have tested the efficacy of DBT in resolving different symptoms associated with BPD in a variety of populations and settings. In studies involving highly suicidal patients, the researchers found out that DBT was effective in resolving a number of dysfunctional and maladaptive behaviours such as suicide including some cases of severe suicidal behaviors and self-jury among the participants as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). Furthermore, it has been shown in these studies that the tendency to use psychiatric facilities was less among BPD clients who had been treated using the DBT approach (Neacsiu et al., 2012; Bedics, Atkins, Comtois, Linehan, 2011; Pistorello et al., 2012; Harned et al., 2009; Iverson, Shenk, Fruzzetti, 2009). On the other hand, the effectiveness of DBT has been investigated in the treatment of other psychosocial issues, and there are promising results, particularly in treating anxiety, substance abuse, eating disorders, ADHD, and treatment-resistant depression (Rizvi, Steffel, Carson-Wong, 2012). References Bedics, J. D., Atkins, D. C., Comtois, K. A., Linehan, M. M., (2012). Treatment differences in the therapeutic relationship and introject during a 2-year randomized controlled trial of dialectical behaviour therapy versus nonbehavioural psychotherapy experts for borderline personality disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(1), 66-77. Crowell, S. E., Beauchaine, T. P., Linehan, M. M. (2009). A biosocial developmental model of borderline personality: Elaborating and extending Linehan’s theory. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 495-510. Dimeff Linehan, M. M. (2001). Dialectical behaviour therapy in a nutshell. California Psychologist, 34, 10-13. Feigenbaum, J. (2207). Dialectical be haviour therapy: An increasing evidence base. Journal of Mental Health, 16(1), 51-60. Harned, M. S., Chapman, A. L., Dexter-Mazza, E. T., Murray, A., Comtois, K. A., Linehan, M. M. (2009). Treating co-occurring Axis I disorders in recurrently suicidal women with borderline personality disorder: A 2-year randomized trial of dialectical behaviour therapy versus community treatment by experts. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(1), 35-45. Huss, D. B., Baer, R. A. (2007). Acceptance and change: The integration of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy into ongoing dialectical behaviour therapy in a case of borderline personality disorder with depression. Clinical Case Studies, 6(1), 17-33. Iverson, K. M., Shenk, C., Fruzzetti, A. E. (2009). Dialectical behaviour therapy for women victims of domestic abuse: A pilot study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 242-248. Kliem, S., Kroger, C., Kosfelder, J. (2010). Dialectical behaviour therapy for b orderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis using mixed effects modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(6), 936-951. Koerner, K., Linehan, M. M. (1992). Integrative therapy for borderline personality disorder: Dialectical behaviour therapy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.). Handbook of Psychotherapy integration (pp. 433-459). New York, NY: Basic Books. Linehan, M. M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford. Linehan, M. M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford. Linehan, M. M., Bohus, M., Lynch, T. (2007). Dialectical behaviour therapy for pervasive emotion dysregulation: Theoretical and practical underpinnings. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 581-605). New York, NY: Guilford. Miller, A. L., Rathus, J. H., Linehan, M. M. (2007). Dialectical behaviour therapy with suicidal adolescents. New York, NY: Guilford. Neacsiu, A. D., Ward-Ciesielski, E. F., Linehan, M. M. (2012). Emerging approaches to counseling intervention: Dialectical behaviour therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 1003-1032. Palmer, R. L. (2002). Dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8(1), 10-16. Piatorello, J. Fruzzetti, A. E., MacLane, C., Gallop, R., Iverson, K. M. (2012). Dialectical Behaviour therapy (DBT) applied to college students: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Advance Online Publication. Rizvi, S. L., Steffel, L. M., Carson-Wong, A. (2012). An overview of dialectical behavioral therapy for professional psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Advance Online Publication. Robins, C. J., Schmidt, Linehan, M. M. (2004). Dialectical behaviour therapy: Synthesizing radical acceptance with skillful means. In S. C. Hayes, V. M. Follette, M. M. Linehan (Eds.), Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding t he cognitive-behavioural tradition (pp. 30-44). New York, NY: Guilford. Swales, M. A. (2009). Dialectical behaviour therapy: Description, research and future directions. The International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 5(2), 164-177. Wix, S. (2003). Dialectical behaviour therapy observed. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 5(2), 3-7.

A Friend of Jims

A Friend of Jims A Friend of Jims A Friend of Jims By Maeve Maddox Theo Smith writes: I am often frustrated by what I call a double possessive. We seem to say and write friends of Jims not friends of Jim when the item possessed   is stated before that which possesses it. But when the possessor is identified first, we say, for example, Jims friends. Whats up with this? The double possessive appears in that of indicates possession and so does the apostrophe s (s) appended to the possessor. What can you tell me about this?    This double genitive construction includes both a friend of Jims and a friend of his. Its one of those English idioms that tries the souls of logic lovers, but it has been in the language for a very long time because it works. The double genitive makes it possible to distinguish between definiteness and indefiniteness. It also eliminates ambiguity. For example, theres a distinct difference of meaning between the following phrases: a photo of Daniel a photo of Daniels Although in use since Chaucers time or before, the double genitive attracted the attention of 18th century grammarians; their disapproval did nothing to stamp it out. Modern style manuals offer guidelines. According to the Chicago Manual of Style, The possessive form may be preceded by of where one of several is implied. â€Å"A friend of Dick’s† and â€Å"a friend of his† are equally acceptable. 7.29 The AP Style Book goes into more detail: DOUBLE POSSESSIVE: Two conditions must apply for a double possessivea phrase such as a friend of Johnsto occur: The word after of must refer to an animate object, and The word before of must involve only a portion of the animate objects possessions. Otherwise, do not use the possessive form of the word after of: The friends of John Adams mourned his death. (All the friends were involved.) He is a friend of the college. (Not colleges because college is inanimate). For a linguists take on the double genitive, read Mark Libermans Genitive Anxiety. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:75 Contronyms (Words with Contradictory Meanings)"Confused With" and "Confused About"7 Sound Techniques for Effective Writing

MRSA Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 1

MRSA - Research Paper Example It is bothersome for immunocompromised patients. MRSA gains entry into the body through these lesions on the skin and can spread to other organs too. Once it gains entry into the internal organs the condition may worsen and symptoms like, fever, chills, reduction in blood pressure, pain in joints could be witnessed, further, headaches, shortness of breath may result. Under grave conditions rashes appear all through the body and a medical emergency occurs. The condition may lead to endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, sepsis, osteomyelitis all these conditions may turn out to be fatal. Tracing the history, it was discovered in 1961 in UK. Later, in 1981, it come into notice in USA amongst the drug abusers or those who were taking medications through intravenous routes. It is because of its terrifying nature it is also referred as â€Å"super bug† in medical science. With time the bacterium has gained resistance over different antibiotics and thus has emerged as ferocious disease causing organism. Records state that the number of cases are enhancing at a rapid pace. According to published reports by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 127,000 cases were reported in 1999 while in 2005 the number augmented to 278,000, moreover the death toll also enhanced from 11,000 to 17,000. Further it was estimated that 94,360 deaths were due to MRSA infection, of these 18,650 were due to hospitalizations in the year 2005 (Klein, 2007). The statistics suggests that MRSA is responsible for greater number of deaths per year in USA as compared to the deaths caused by AIDS (Stein, 2007). Based on the studies, MRSA has been categorized as Community Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) or Healthcare Associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). 1. MRSA is a painful condition; individuals with compromised immune system may get affected at a rapid pace as compared to those with enhanced immunity. It is observed that consumption of junk food or food items poor in

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Essay

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke - Essay Example Thus, in a social contract to which they voluntarily consented, they created the state for the purpose of promoting and preserving their natural rights to life, liberty and property. It was John Locke who painted a picture of liberty of citizens and authority of government in tones which were far moderate than that of Thomas Hobbes. Men in a state of nature could make use of their perfect freedom for their own good, since they were reasonable men. To John Locke, men did not abuse their Liberty. They did not threaten the lives of their neighbors. He wrote: Though this is a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license. The state of nature of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges everyone; and reason, which is that law that teaches all mankind who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent; no one has a right to harm another in his life, health, liberty of possessions. 1 Locke's social contract favored men quitting the state of nature to form themselves into a civil society. In this society men instituted the state where a social contract or covenant was formulated between citizens and government, a trustee which they could dismiss if it did not maintain the freedom and equality that men originally knew and enjoyed. In other words, when government no longer served the citizens' interests and welfare, it might be resisted or overthrown. Why, because government had violated its obligations under the social contract to the extent that it had broken it. What were these obligations The government as trustee had to protect and preserve people's rights, especially natural rights as explained above. Otherwise, the contractual agreement which was the basis of government's existence would be without substance and meaning. Locke asserted that men should retain their natural rights in civil society and that political powers or sovereignty should not be assigned to the monarch, but to the people's representatives in parliament who should be supreme. In Locke's view, the legislative power could never be arbitrary, since under the doctrine of popular sovereignty, the people had the supreme power to change, through peaceful election or revolution, their representatives in the parliament whenever such representatives acted contrary to the trust reposed in them. Locke's social contract puts in perspective the parliamentary democracy of limited government that many states have today, which stresses the protection and promotion of individual rights to life, liberty and property. Locke's reason for favoring a civil government to impose upon man some restrictions of government authority was that men after all were not impartial judges of their friends' shortcomings. He admitted that human frailties could lead to abuse of power. 2 Popular sovereignty is supreme authority of the state which resides in the people. This authority means that the people are the ultimate source of power and so they possess coercive power to control government through which they allow themselves to be governed. It was said that sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them. This view is embodied in Locke's theory of popular sovereignty in which the citizens have the vested right and power to choose their representat